Thursday, September 29, 2022

Port Authority Officer and former MLB Pitcher Killed in Car Accident

In the early morning hours of September 11, 2022, Port Authority Officer and former MLB pitcher Anthony Varvaro was killed in a car accident. He was traveling to a September 11 memorial ceremony along the New Jersey Turnpike Hudson Bay Extension when he was struck by a Toyota driving in the wrong direction. The driver, Henry Plazas, also died in the crash.

Anthony Varvaro had a unique story and role in his community. Born in 1984 in Staten Island, New York, Varvaro knew the friends and families of many first responders who had lost their lives on 9/11. His memory of 9/11 and the first responders’ great sacrifices inspired his decision to retire from the MLB to become a Port Authority police officer. While competing in the minor leagues, he completed a bachelor’s degree in Criminal Justice from St. John’s University. After entering the MLB, he pitched for the Seattle Mariners, Atlanta Braves, and Boston Red Sox, and retired after six years. He then served as a Port Authority patrol officer for five years before transferring to work as an Academy Instructor. While a patrol officer, Varvaro was stationed at the World Trade Center Command.

Varvaro’s contribution to his Staten Island community went far beyond his service as an officer. When he presented to high school students, he stressed to them the importance of continuing their education and persevering despite the challenges they would face. In 2021, he was named president of the Snug Harbor Little League, which he used as an opportunity to campaign for league facility renovations; the League ultimately received $1.2 million in funding.

At home, Varvaro was a devoted husband and the father of four children. He was beloved by his workplace, community, friends, and family.

When something as tragic as this occurs, family members often look for answers.  Since both drivers perished, the facts and circumstances can only be pieced together by a thorough investigation.  Undoubtedly, state and perhaps local authorities are in that process now.  They usually do this to determine whether criminal charges should be filed.  The fact that the reckless driver died may affect the extent of the investigation.  The family does have a right to bring a wrongful death civil lawsuit and that comes with months of fact discovery.  Unfortunately, by reason of New Jersey’s antiquated wrongful death laws, they can only recover his conscious pain and suffering as well as their future economic losses.  Sadly, their emotional loss is not considered. That is the second tragedy; The emotional loss of family members does not count.  In the memory of Officer Varvaro, the legislators and governor need to correct this defect in our law. I call upon New Jersey to pass the Varvaro Law to honor his memory.

We at the Law Office of Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C, extend our sincere condolences to all those affected by Anthony Varvaro’s passing.  May his memory be a blessing.

About the author

Garry Salomon is a founding partner of Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C. and serves as the managing partner. He is Certified by the Supreme Court of New Jersey as a Civil Trial Attorney, an honor held by less than 2% of attorneys. Garry Salomon’s main areas of concentration include all areas of personal injury law. He is also the author of the book “The Consumer’s Guide to New Jersey Personal Injury Claims.” To receive a free copy, please email community@dsslaw.com or fill out our online form.

The post Port Authority Officer and former MLB Pitcher Killed in Car Accident appeared first on Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C..



from Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C. https://www.dsslaw.com/blog/port-authority-officer-and-former-mlb-pitcher-killed-in-car-accident/
via https://www.dsslaw.com/

Friday, September 23, 2022

How Collision Avoidance Technology Has Changed Auto Accident Trends

Since the 1960s, auto manufacturers have incorporated innovative technologies into their vehicles to make them safer. Seatbelts, anti-lock brakes, crumple zones, and airbags have collectively saved hundreds of thousands of lives. One of the most exciting developments over the last decade is computer-assisted collision avoidance technology, which claims to prevent crashes before they even happen. But just how does it work, and does it actually reduce collisions?

The legal team at Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C. wants to help you understand the ins and outs of crash avoidance systems and how the technology has changed auto accident trends. If you’ve been in an accident involving a failure of a collision avoidance system, contact us today for a free consultation.

What Are Collisions Avoidance Systems?

More and more vehicles are being manufactured with collision avoidance systems as standard safety features. These systems are designed to alert drivers to potential threats and help them avoid accidents. Most rely on cutting-edge technology such as advanced camera systems, lasers, and short- and long-range radar. These collision avoidance systems are constantly monitoring what is happening around a vehicle. When a sensor is triggered by a potential threat, like another car or pedestrian nearby, the system will alert the driver through noises or flashing lights.

As common as car crash prevention technology has become, it is also relatively young. While radar- and laser-based systems began to be developed in the mid-1990s, they did not start becoming standard features until 2016, when the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) announced that manufacturers had agreed to implement them on virtually all new cars by 2022.

The Pros and Cons of Auto Crash Avoidance Systems

Car manufacturers often praise the safety features and technological innovations of their vehicles. While there is no doubt that technological advances in the auto industry can help save lives, there are pros and cons to equipping vehicles with collision avoidance technology.

Cars with collision avoidance systems can increase safety by:

  • Warning drivers of potential threats, allowing them to avoid collisions
  • Detecting blind spots so drivers can make safe lane changes
  • Braking automatically when drivers do not manually apply the brakes in time
  • Avoiding accidental tailgating through adaptive cruise control

However, the drawbacks of crash avoidance systems include the following:

  • The technology may not work correctly at all times — If a camera is dirty or sensors malfunction, the system may not respond correctly to warn a driver of a threat. Drivers who get used to this technology may become too reliant on it, giving them a false sense of security.
  • The technology will only prevent an accident if a driver lets it — A driver who turns the system off to prevent it from beeping or vibrating is less likely to be aware of potential threats.
  • Drivers think the system is driving for them rather than assisting them — A driver must still pay attention to the road and avoid distractions even if their vehicle is equipped with collision avoidance technology.

How Effective Is Crash Avoidance Technology?

When appropriately used, crash avoidance technology can be effective in helping drivers prevent accidents. A recent study by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) compared the rates of police-reported crashes and insurance claims for vehicles with and without certain crash avoidance features.

The results indicate that many of the most popular crash avoidance technologies may significantly reduce the incidence of serious accidents. For example, forward collision-avoidance assist helped reduce the rate of front-to-rear crashes by nearly 30 percent. Rear automatic braking systems helped reduce the rate of backing crashes by almost 80 percent when combined with rearview cameras and parking sensors.

What Crash Avoidance Technology Systems Are Widely Available to Car Drivers?

Crash avoidance technology is a catchall term for a range of different systems. Some of the most common collision avoidance technology features include:

  • Forward collision warning (FCW)– FCW technology can detect potential hazards when a vehicle is moving forward. The system will alert the driver when a threat is detected through an audible or visual cue. Some of these systems can detect pedestrians or objects on the road.
  • Front-cross traffic system– Similar to FCW technology, these sensors detect vehicles in front of a car.
  • Pedestrian detection (PD) –A PD system helps detect nearby pedestrians and alert drivers. Some systems will automatically apply the brakes if a driver gets too close.
  • Lane departure warning (LDW)– A LDW system tracks the movement and position of a vehicle while in a driving lane. If the car approaches lane markers, the system will alert the driver.
  • Active cruise control (ACC) – An ACC system regulates a vehicle’s acceleration and braking patterns to help maintain distance between other cars while cruise control is activated.
  • Blindspot monitoring – A blind-spot monitoring system scans the areas behind and to the side of a vehicle. If the system identifies something in the blind spot while the turn signal is engaged, it will alert the driver that a hazard has been detected.
  • Obstacle-aware acceleration – Some vehicles are equipped with obstacle-aware acceleration features, which reduce acceleration if an object is detected in the car’s direct driving path.
  • Automatic emergency braking (AEB) – The AEB system will automatically apply the brakes if it detects a potential collision while the car is moving forward. Some of these systems detect pedestrians and objects.
  • High-speed automatic emergency braking (HAEB)– This system will apply automatic brakes if a potential collision is detected while a vehicle is traveling at high speeds.

Contact an Experienced New Jersey Auto Accident Attorney Today

Crash avoidance technology may prove crucial to decreasing accidents on the road. But it is not foolproof. Technology can fail, and driver error is still possible even if a vehicle is equipped with technology that works perfectly. Drivers who become too reliant on crash avoidance systems may use them as a crutch, thinking they can drive more aggressively or less carefully because the technology will compensate.

All manufacturers of products have a legal obligation to make their products safe for the consumer. This applies to all car manufacturers. These safety systems are still evolving technologies, however, they are expected to function in accordance with the current state of the art for each system as delivered. In other words, they are supposed to warn and break based upon those system’s specifications as represented to the public by that automaker. If a system totally fails to operate, a person may have a product liability claim against the manufacturer. That being said, these claims are extremely expensive to prove and vigorously defended by automobile manufacturers, so it only makes sense to pursue a claim when a serious life-changing injury or death is involved. Common product liability cases that have been successful include exploding gas tanks igniting a car on fire and injuring its occupants.

If you were injured in a collision involving car crash prevention technology malfunction in New Jersey, the legal team at Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C. is here. For over 40 years, we have helped secure compensation for New Jersey injury victims like you. Contact our office today for a free case evaluation with an experienced New Jersey auto accident attorney. 

The post How Collision Avoidance Technology Has Changed Auto Accident Trends appeared first on Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C..



from Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C. https://www.dsslaw.com/blog/collision-avoidance-tech-changed-crash-trends/
via https://www.dsslaw.com/

Friday, September 9, 2022

First Responders – Our Literary Heroes Come to Life

Today marks the 21st anniversary of the 911 terrorist attack.  Many people still clearly recall where they were and what they were doing at the exact moment they first learned about the attack.   For the days and weeks that followed, the public watched with admiration the courage, selflessness, and unbreakable commitment of the 9/11 first responders. They were and still are our heroes.

The attacks of September 11, 2001, killed 2,996 people throughout Pennsylvania, Washington D.C, and the World Trade Center.   Of those souls, 343 were NYFD firefighters, paramedics, and EMTs. Another 37 people belonged to the Port Authority Police Department (PAPD), and 23 to the New York Police Department (NYPD). The PAPD and NYPD suffered the greatest loss of life of any police force in history.

The World Trade Center hosted over 50,000 workers.  Thousands of guests passed through the complex daily. While thousands of civilians were injured, many more would have lost their lives had it not been for the first responders, training, bravery, and professionalism.

In the days and weeks that followed, NY’s first responders, including many volunteers, worked franticly side by side” with construction workers, and search-and-rescue dogs looking for survivors. The work at “Ground Zero was so dangerous that workers and volunteers wrote identifying information on their bodies in case they were crushed or fell into the debris. Fires continued to burn for 99 days following the attack.

Residents of New York City and North Jersey still recall the distinct smell of the air coming from the remnants of the incinerated buildings.  For many of those rescue workers, 9/11 continues to haunt them as they suffer the daily side effects of breathing that toxic air.  Many first responders began to suffer the effects of the polluted air while digging through the rubble while clearing Ground Zero: it wasn’t long before the respiratory issues associated with 9/11 were dubbed the “WTC cough.”

Garry Salomon, managing partner of the North Jersey personal injury law firm Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C. understands this well because most of their injured clients benefited from the police that arrived at their crash scene, the firefighters that extricated them from the wreck, and the EMTs and ambulance workers that rushed them to the hospital. “In the past, I’ve associated 9/11 with terror and loss, but now I see 9/11 as a testament to the heroics and bravery of the First Responders.  Many of the responders were not only New Yorkers but were volunteers traveling from all over the world.  We honor them today, as well as on “National First Responders Day” which is October 28th” every year,” said Salomon.  He further commented, “if it were not for their training, professionalism, and bravery many of our injured clients would have suffered far worse pain and injury.  These responders, many of them anonymous volunteers, do this not for recognition or attention.  To them, they were just doing their job.  Helping people.”

To thank local first responders, Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C. on behalf of the firm’s clients, is catering a kosher lunch from Ma’adan on September 11, 2022, for the volunteers and workers at the Teaneck Ambulance Corp.  The lawyers, staff, and clients of Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C. express their gratitude, respect, and appreciation to all first responders.  They truly are angels touching people’s lives and making a difference every day.

The post First Responders – Our Literary Heroes Come to Life appeared first on Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C..



from Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C. https://www.dsslaw.com/blog/first-responders-our-literary-heroes-come-to-life/
via https://www.dsslaw.com/

Monday, September 5, 2022

Drowsy Drivers are Dangerous Drivers

The benefits of sleeping for at least eight hours each night are widely known and accepted by the general public. Proper rest is associated with increased productivity, improved concentration, and a boosted mood. But as a tired driver, you are not just less friendly to your passengers onboard—you are also dangerous.

During the early hours of Friday, September 2nd, a Ford Econoline E350 van carrying twelve passengers was driving through Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. Its driver fell asleep at the wheel, causing the van to swerve, roll over, and crash into the trees by Exit 2 of the Palisades Interstate Parkway. Then Palisades Interstate Parkway (PIP) police as well as the Englewood Cliffs and Fort Lee Fire Departments retrieved and rescued the occupants of the van.  Unfortunately, four of the twelve passengers died on impact, while the other eight were transported to nearby hospitals to receive treatment.

The injured and dead are reported to be Dominican immigrants who were hired by “On Target”, an employment agency in Inwood, and were required to ride a shuttle to the facility.  According to reports there was a history of problems with the transportation service.  Officials believe that the twelve victims worked at the Amscan in Chester, New York, and the driver was transporting them home when he may have fallen asleep. Amscan’s parent company is Party City Holdings. It is not uncommon for companies to hire staff through an employee leasing agency that will be responsible for HR decisions and matters, however, that may not necessarily relieve an agency client from responsibility and liability.  From a legal point of view, they will be able to file Worker’s Compensation Claims and injury and wrongful death claims for their injuries and financial losses against several business entities regardless of their immigration status.

Several major organizations have expressed concern or have conducted research studying the effect of “drowsy driving” in the United States. On its website, the Center of Disease Control (CDC) warns that “drowsy driving is a major problem in the United States”. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) reported that in 2020, 633 deaths were caused by drowsy driving. In 2017, the NHTSA released an estimate that 91,000 police-reported crashes involved a drowsy driver. Those crashes caused over 50,000 injuries and almost 800 deaths.

In 2018, the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety discovered that drowsy driving is more prevalent issue than presented by federal estimates. This discrepancy is explained by how difficult it is to assess fatigue’s role in an accident. The Foundation examined “in-vehicle dashcam video from over 700 crashes” and found that “9.5 percent of all crashes and 10.8 percent of crashes resulting in significant property damage involved drowsiness”. Federal estimates only consider drowsiness to be a factor in 1-2% of crashes.

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) has established set guidelines limiting the number of hours that commercial truck drivers can work. Their goal is primarily to lessen the possibility of the carrier falling asleep at the wheel. The FMCSA established separate guidelines for property carriers, such as truck drivers. Truck drivers are also required to rest for a period of time between shifts, to not work several consecutive hours, and they must log their hours as evidence that they are adhering to these guidelines.

While it remains unclear if the driver in the September 2nd accident violated the FMCSA guidelines, as a common carrier, he did owe the highest standard of care to his passengers. The transportation company is also at fault for allowing their employee to drive in a state of fatigue, but if Amscan hired the company to drive its employees, Amscan will be at fault as well. For the dead and injured this claim will likely be resolved as a consolidated Bergen County, New Jersey lawsuit among the injured and the family of the deceased.

The CDC suggests to adult drivers and teenage drivers that they get at least seven and eight hours of sleep, respectively. The CDC moreover encourages drivers to establish set sleeping routines, seek treatment if they suffer from a sleeping disorder, and to avoid taking medication that makes them tired.

Reportedly, the driver of the van George Massey, 54 may have suffered a medical emergency.  Under the law, sudden medical emergencies are not considered acts of negligence, however, if the employer knew or should have known about a medical condition that could affect the fitness of a driver then, both the driver and employer may be held responsible for negligent hiring and retention of an employee and negligent entrustment of a vehicle to such employee as a cause of injury or death.   The facts and circumstances of this tragic fatal accident remain under the investigation of the Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office.

The law firm of Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, PC extends its condolences to the families and survivors of this crash.  The firm has a history of investigating and representing people injured in ride share accidents and in wrongful death lawsuits.  The author of this article can be reached at garry.salomon@dsslaw.com or by phone at (201) 907-5000

The post Drowsy Drivers are Dangerous Drivers appeared first on Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C..



from Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C. https://www.dsslaw.com/blog/drowsy-drivers-are-dangerous-drivers/
via https://www.dsslaw.com/

Thursday, September 1, 2022

The Reoccurring Dangers of Ceiling Collapses

Most ceiling collapses are caused by water absorption from leaky roofs, or overflowed toilets, showers, or bathtubs. Water in ceilings can accumulate slowly, from slow leaks or rapidly from a broken pipe. Either way, it creates a danger to people sitting or standing below the ceiling. In fact, it could be deadly. People enjoying the privacy of their apartments take it for granted that they are safe from injury, especially from the ceiling above. Ceiling collapses are more common than one would think, especially in low-income housing.

Devastating Examples of Ceiling Collapses

In 2013, the roof of a supermarket in Riga, Latvia, collapsed and killed 54 shoppers. In 2014, four college students were killed and over fifty were trapped in an auditorium in Gyeonggi, South Korea, after its ceiling toppled inwards. Even, people in Bergen County, New Jersey are not immune from falling ceilings. Recently, an employee of Vintage ’61 on Hudson Street in Ridgewood, was hospitalized after a portion of the store’s ceiling fell on top of her.

The Problem With Ceiling Materials

There are many subtle ways that a ceiling may become exposed to water: culprits include excess condensation from air conditioners, uncleaned spills, and failure to keep the shower curtain inside the bathtub when the faucet is running. The weather can also cause your ceiling to lose its structural integrity, particularly if it is exposed to heavy rains from thunderstorms, floods, and hurricanes.
A sudden ceiling collapse can cause serious injuries because of weighted force. For example, a single piece of sheet rock measuring 4 x 8-foot sheet of standard 5/8-inch-thick drywall weighs 70.4 pounds, with ultralight drywall weighing 51.2 pounds. The weight could easily double when wet. As the sheet rock accumulates water, it sags and becomes unstable causing the ceiling to collapse with the nails remaining in the studs. The same holds true for suspension ceilings, however, given that the suspension tiles are usually 2 x 2 feet, the weight is substantially less.

Drywall replaced lath and plaster in the mid-20th century as the most common material used for interior surfaces and ceilings. While in many ways drywall is the superior alternative to lath and plaster, it is highly susceptible to water damage. It absorbs water upon exposure, and, because water is so heavy, the ceiling may buckle under the extra weight. Before the ceiling collapses, water may cause stains, cracks, or mold growth to appear on the ceiling. People often complain to their landlords about leaking ceilings. Landlords, often ignore the problem because replacing a roof or bathroom fixture can cost a lot of money.

Most Common Injuries From Ceiling Collapses

Proving Negligence in a Ceiling Collapse Case

Property managers are responsible for maintaining their property, as required by New Jersey State Building and Construction Codes (BOCA) and the NJ Department of Community Affairs (DCA) Code. Landlords should complete regular inspections to ensure that their property abides by the DCA’s safety standards. These inspections may expose obvious warning signs, such as mold, but clogged gutters and leaking HVAC or plumbing systems may also indicate a damaged ceiling. A manager’s failure to properly maintain their property may lead to a ceiling collapse that injures a tenant, a patron and unfortunately their children. If such an incident occurs, the manager will be held liable. A ceiling may also collapse due to poor construction, in which case the construction contractor would be held liable for the negligence of its employees.

In New Jersey, tenants have a right to reside within properly maintained apartments because leases usually require landlords to make structural repairs. Failing to make such repairs is negligence and when it causes injury, the landlord is responsible. In fact, since the safety of the ceiling may be within the exclusive control of the landlord, the injured tenant may not have to prove negligence because of the legal doctrine of Res ipsa loquitur. Res ipsa loquitur is a Latin phrase that means “the thing speaks for itself.” In personal injury law, the concept of res ipsa loquitur (or just “res ipsa” for short) operates as an evidentiary rule that allows plaintiffs to establish a rebuttable presumption of negligence on the part of the landlord. That means, the landlord must prove that they were not at fault.

Contacting a Personal Injury Law Firm

If you or a loved one have recently been injured due to a ceiling collapse, you have the right to the landlord or the property owner for your injuries and financial losses. The experienced personal injury attorneys at Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C, may be able to help you. Please call us now for a free and confidential case evaluation at 1-800LAW-2000.

The post The Reoccurring Dangers of Ceiling Collapses appeared first on Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C..



from Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C. https://www.dsslaw.com/blog/the-reoccurring-dangers-of-ceiling-collapses/
via https://www.dsslaw.com/

Legislation to Hold Drunk Drivers Accountable if They Kill a Parent in a Crash Gains Traction

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), drunk driving causes an average of 32 fatalities every day in the United States — or one every 45 minutes. There were nearly 12,000 people killed in drunk driving crashes in one recent year alone, accounting for more than a quarter of all traffic fatalities that year.

When drunk driving crashes claim the lives of parents with young children, those children are often left without the financial support they need to live healthy, productive lives. However, new legislation known as Bentley’s Law seeks to remedy these tragedies. The law requires that drunk drivers pay child support to the children they’ve deprived of their parents. Tennessee has already passed the legislation, with several other states considering following its lead.

What Is Bentley’s Law?

Cecilia Williams, a resident of Missouri, came up with the idea for Bentley’s Law after her adult son was killed in a crash caused by a drunk driver, along with his fiancĂ©e and their infant child. Williams was left to raise her son’s two other children, Bentley and Mason. Bentley’s Law would hold drunk drivers liable for child maintenance payments if they cause a crash that kills the child’s parent.

Williams has emphasized that she did not propose the law solely for her own family but for all families. Her goal is to provide for children who have lost their parents due to the reckless actions of an intoxicated driver. Williams’s initiative has received widespread support from state legislatures across the country.

More than a dozen states have either introduced their own version of “Bentley’s Law” or are drafting bills modeled after Williams’s proposal. Advocacy groups like Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) have also come out in support of the initiative.

What States Require Child Support to Surviving Children of Parents Killed by Drunk Drivers?

Tennessee recently passed legislation requiring anyone who kills a parent by vehicular homicide to pay restitution to the victim’s surviving minor children until the children reach adulthood. Tennessee is the first state to pass a bill like this into law.

Child maintenance is typically determined based on parental income. But under H.B. 1834, restitution is determined by factors such as the following:

  • The child’s financial needs and resources
  • The finances and resources of the child’s surviving parent, if they have one
  • The child’s standard of living

The Tennessee bill is entitled “Ethan’s, Hailey’s, and Bentley’s Law,” which includes the names of the children of a Tennessee police officer who was killed by a drunk driver in 2019 with the name of Cecilia Williams’s grandchild. The bill faced no opposition in the state House or Senate and passed both chambers unanimously.

Which States Are Proposing Laws Similar to Bentley’s Law?

In addition to Tennessee, other states have also been considering similar DWI laws to make drunk drivers responsible for child support if they cause the death of a person with minor children.

In New York, two lawmakers are working on bills that would make drunk drivers responsible for child support if their recklessness results in the death of a custodial parent. New York State Senator Andrew Gounardes drafted a bill inspired by the recently enacted Tennessee law.

Under Gounardes’s bill, the at-fault motorist would make child maintenance payments until the child turns 18. Anyone convicted of first- or second-degree vehicular manslaughter or aggravated vehicular homicide would be affected by the law.

Goundares’s bill matches another bill that New York State Assemblymember Desmond Meeks of Rochester previously drafted. Meeks also hopes to pass legislation that addresses non-DWI reckless driving. His law would require reckless motorists to pay child support if their actions result in the death of a minor’s parent.

Other states considering legislation modeled after Bentley’s Law include the following:

  • Missouri
  • Alabama
  • Oklahoma
  • Louisiana
  • Illinois
  • Pennsylvania

How Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C. Is Taking Action Against Drunk Drivers

For decades, the attorneys at Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C. have advocated for greater protections for the victims of drunk drivers. Although New Jersey’s drunk driving laws do not currently have a version of Bentley’s Law on the books, we strongly believe that this type of legislation is needed in our state. Having seen first-hand the devastation that impaired driving causes, we firmly believe that drunk drivers should be held financially liable when they rob young children of a parent. To help with these efforts, our esteemed partner Steven Benvenisti, Esq, serves as the Chair of the Board of the New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania MADD regions.

Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C. also supports other initiatives to address the issue of drunk driving in New Jersey, such as the following:

  • Ignition interlock devices (IIDs) — Mandatory IIDs have prevented millions of people from driving drunk since 2006. Our partner Steven Benvenisti, Esqwas responsible for recently passed legislation that requires every drunk-driving offender in the state to install an IID in their vehicle. These breathalyzer devices can be used to prevent motorists convicted of driving under the influence from operating a vehicle if they are not sober.
  • Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety (DADSS) — DADSS is a similar technology that can be used to prevent drunk driving. DADSS systems can be breath- or touch-based and are designed to detect a driver’s BAC before they start their vehicle. This technology could also prevent motorists with DWI convictions from starting their vehicles if impaired.
  • Ridesharing and smartphone apps — For anyone who finds themselves too intoxicated to get home safely on their own, we strongly urge the use of designated drivers, taxis, and ridesharing apps.

Contact the DWI Injury Attorneys at Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C. Today

If you were injured in a crash involving a drunk driver or your loved one was killed due to the negligence of an impaired motorist, you could be entitled to seek compensation. Find out how our New Jersey drunk driving accident lawyers can help. Contact Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C. today for a free initial consultation to discuss the details of your case.

The post Legislation to Hold Drunk Drivers Accountable if They Kill a Parent in a Crash Gains Traction appeared first on Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C..



from Davis, Saperstein & Salomon, P.C. https://www.dsslaw.com/blog/drunk-drivers-pay-child-support/
via https://www.dsslaw.com/